My Tractor Forum banner

Ugliest thing on 4 wheels?

11K views 54 replies 27 participants last post by  bccan  
#1 ·
I was perusing the local craigslist for Cubs today and came across someone selling a Cub Cadet 1027. Definitely did a double-take:

Image


What in the world was the target market for this? Suburban art-school graduates? Is that a mower or a go-cart someone bodged a deck to?

I perfectly understand that not every lawn or garden mower/tractor needs to look like a miniature farm tractor, but what were they thinking? Hard to believe this was being sold during the prime Cub 3000 era.
 
#5 ·
Must have been something to do with the Y2K.
 
#6 ·
I agree it looks very unconventional, maybe bizarre and even freakish. Definitely a niche market for them.

Too small for me to have a use for. Then again I set up my lawn so I can fit anywhere with a large machine- one big tree I have to go around and no tight inside corners. I can mow it almost as fast with a conventional front steer tractor or a residential zero turn. Haven’t tried the stand on commercial zero turn I want yet.

In contrast with the first parts of this thread, I would like to point out the design has some “clever” to it with the integrated bagger. It can fit places other comparable sized bagger equipped RERs won’t very easily where extremely tight maneuvering is required. I think a few other offshoots of this design were produced by “other” brands.
 
#43 ·
My first riding mower was like that but only it was a John Deer. I called it the Turtle. Sure could get around things good and good for a smaller lawn. Probably not real
expensive either.


View attachment 2511622
I owned one of those for over 15 years. It served me well cutting my half acre. I had to replace the drive belt and that was it. Now I have a JD 1025 R which takes care of our 11 acres.
 
#15 ·
It is a Yard Bug Made Under Cub Cadet, White & Yardman and does Have the the Internal Bagging system I think it was 1.5 Bushel or 2.5 Can't remember Perfect for a small Yard But it was messy and you tended to cover the engine in grass (y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bontai Joe
#21 ·
Bottom Car Looks Like a Morgan But I don't really know Cars except I wouldn't want a Morgan! Get In accident You need a new Frame Because they are wood frames (y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bontai Joe
#19 ·
Yeah, about 2/3 of what's being put out on the roads these days.
2511679
 
#24 ·
I'm not arguing that the Cub 1027/Yard-Man Yard Bug were bad machines, or even possibly perfectly sized for some yards, but they're just flat out ugly. The various others that have been posted in this thread, such as the John Deere 56, Weed Eater WE-ONE, and Honda H3009/H3011/H3013, all manage to satisfy the same niche market without looking like they were designed by a turtle-obsessed grade-schooler.
 
#27 ·
#33 ·
We call those community mowers...I never liked them a pain in the back side to work on no room unless u tare it apart lol ...The weedeater brand had a plastic transmission that also broke ...I don't see many of them anymore
 
#35 ·
I was watching a yt video on the top 20 ugliest cars ever produced and they listed the Triumph TR7, bull puckey I bought one in '74 when they first rolled out and it was a chick magnet. I kept it until I graduated college in '76 when a young girl wanted worse than I did. To me the ugliest car was my 1st, a baby blue '63 4 dr. Mercury Comet aka the "Vomet". It had a little 6cyl., 3 on the tree, drum brakes, no a/c or power steering, now that thing was butt ugly but at least I had a ride in high school that got a gazillion mpg. Only one of my "so called" friends would ride in it and that was because he didn't have a car.:rolleyes:
 
#37 ·
I think a Prius makes the pacer look like a super model of cars the rolling toasters are ugly as sin too