My Tractor Forum banner

318 vs 320 (and way more)

8.4K views 7 replies 7 participants last post by  theburtman  
#1 ·
I have a 265. It seems that it shares most of the same parts (other than engine) with a 285 and a 320 (320 adds hydraulics - it seems).

The 318 is a famous little tractor and seems to be one of the most revered pieces of 1990 technology (perhaps I'm just reading too much from a few vocal people, not sure).

While JD is not known for making models easy to understand, one might think that a 320 would be very similar to a 318. So, are they remotely close?

In short, could I, in theory, repower my 265 to be the beast that a 318 is? I know the transmissions aren't the same, but are they remotely in the same ballpark?

Or, am I just getting really excited about nothing?

While we're talking about repowering a 265, what are my options? I'd certainly prefer a v-twin over a single cylinder.
 
#2 ·
Totally different ball parks. In the 80's Deere had the 200 and 300 series. 200's were heavy duty gear drive manual lift machines. 300's were hydrostatic drive with hydraulic lift.
The they changed to your version of the 200 series- adding hydro trans to manual lift tractors. The 300 series kept hydro lift ( more of a toy hydraulic lift system than the 318's real true hydraulics ) and tranny but were changed from a shaft driven, horizontal engine configuration to a belt driven trans and vertical shaft engine. I believe this move streamlined things so many parts and attachments could be swapped from one series to the other which was not possible before.
So basically the 320 and 265 have a lot in common with each other, but nothing in common with a 318.

While the 265 320 etc are still very capable machines- Deere just went a new direction. The 318 is more on par with the later 425 - 455 tractors but in a smaller and more primitive package.
Does that make sense ?
 
#3 ·
Ditto. And yes, the 318 is considered one of the best garden tractors ever built. It out sold every other model before it, by a long shot. Basically every hydro machine pre 1992 shared a lot in common, and every gear drive model in that same range had a lot in common. Everything changed in 93

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
#4 ·
Thanks guys. I had a feeling I wasn't as lucky as I'd hoped. I don't know why manufacturers can't figure out a model numbering system that makes sense. It looks like they tried with the GT series -- reused old model numbers, but at least added a "series" to them.

I've tried to come up with a solution, but it wasn't simple. However, there has to be a better way.
 
#5 ·
...

While JD is not known for making models easy to understand, one might think that a 320 would be very similar to a 318.
As stated, they are close numerically but not in any other respect. Regarding your comments on model numbering, don't even ask how a X585 compares to a X590 or your head will blow up. :tango_face_smile_bi
 
#6 ·
Using a dart board and a blindfold for model numbering is very imprecise. :tango_face_surprise