My Tractor Forum banner
61 - 78 of 78 Posts
How about the Ultima GTR

One of the fastest cars in the world, you can build in your own garage!
Very nice, of course my rear wouldn't be able to get out of it (too low) once I was in.

Funny how the Top Gear people wouldn't do a test of it ?

That is a true sports car in it's purest form even if it is just $50.000

I should be kicked for forgetting this remake of an icon the Ford GT40

Ron
 

Attachments

New = Ford GT
Old = Shelby GT500 or Hemi Cuda
 
Speaking of GTR I forgot the Nissan GTR-R.
Oh man those are sweet. Have you seen the Launch Control on the new ones?

2 overlooked sports cars!
Image

Image
 
Mclaren F1. 107 made and about 1/3 were race versions. I don't know how to post pictures of one on here. As of summer 2008 I found out someone here in the Twin Cities has one but I have not seen it and don't know who owns it. If someone wants to give me $4,000,000 I'll see if one is up for sale.

Ferrari 355. There is a silver one in town owned by an arrogant creep. I would love a bright red one. Wearing hearing protection and mowing grass next to a 4 lane highway that comes to town I heard a noise like a low flying jet aircraft. I look to the highway to see a red Ferrari 355 going down the left lane at least 120 if not 150. The idiot driving it should have been thrown in jail.

While not technically a sports car (sports cars have 2 seats) I'd love to have a bright red 85 Mustang GT 5 speed with the grey interior. Last year they were made with a carburator. There were many improvements over the 84 model and it was the year I graduated. My first car was a 79 Mustang Indy Pace car with 302 and a 4 speed. I enjoyed the car a lot but it was a bit too fast for a 20 year old with not a lot of driving experience.

Back in 95 I worked at a wholesale dealer to dealer car auction and drove or saw everything but a Ferrari or Lamboghini. Favorite car was a yellow/gold 95 Corvette ZR1. I was nervious beyond belief. Boss told me if I spun one tire I would be fired on the spot. Also drove a Mercedes SL500 but liked the ZR1 better. A Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo was another great car. Chevy 454SS was all motor and little traction. A late 70s Camaro came in with every spoiler, chrome add on you had ever seen. Overdone if you ask me. Rear tires were very wide and fronts were very narrow. Heading through the lot the throttle linkage stuck to the underside of the air cleaner and the car took off on me. Braking did nothing but lock up the front tires and the rear tires were spinning and smoking like crazy. My butt was literally off the seat as I stood on the brake and pulled on the steering wheel trying to stop this beast. I turned the car and got it into park. There was a large "J" shaped set of tire spinning marks on the parking lot from that car.
 
Mclaren F1. 107 made and about 1/3 were race versions. I don't know how to post pictures of one on here.
Here ya go:

Image
 
I know its not the most exotic or most expensive vehicle, but you have to admit that these are bad ***. They yield some serious performance figures too .... plus you can load up the entire family for a sunday afternoon drive.

Image
[/IMG]

"The GNX is an ax-wielding barbarian laying waste to everything in it's path" "Rockets to 60 mph in 4.7 seconds and squirts through the quarter-mile in 13.5 seconds at 102 mph"

(Tony Assenza) Car & Driver, May 1987: Buick GNX


The car covers a quarter mile from standing in 13.5 seconds, doing 102 mph when it hits the quarter mile mark. The maximum horsepower produced by the GNX is 276 horsepower at 4,400 rpm (very much under-rated because they didnt want to make the Corvette look bad). The maximum torque of the car is 360 ft-lb at 3,000 rpm. The top speed of the GNX is 124 mph, due to the engine being electronically limited.



The GNX was designed to be the "Grand National to end all Grand Nationals". Outwardly the GNX resembles the Grand National but the modifications performed on these cars made them one of the fastest, best handling and most sought after cars Buick had ever built. It was developed by the then Advanced Concepts & Marketing Vehicles manager, Mike Doble. The car was to be converted by ASC/McLaren. McLaren had been involved with the original Buick/McLaren V-6 racer used at Indy and the 24 valve V-6 Wildcat concept car. McLaren had also developed some early prototypes of the Intercooled Grand National. The basic concept was to build the car to be a full second quicker than the Grand National and improve it's handling. Although plans called for Engine blueprinting, head porting, special bearings, shot-peened rods, and a high-rpm valve train, testing of stock Grand National engines showed that the GNX goal could be met without opening the engine. There were 547 GNXs built and all were 2 door coupes and optioned the same, there were no additions or deletions. To quote the Owners manual "The GNX is a special Grand National with certain modifications to accentuate it's already outstanding performance." Basically the body and drivetrain remained common with the turbocharged Regal Grand National with a few exceptions.
 
id like to smoke some hondas with that
 
That's all way cool but do you seriously think that either one would stand a chance against a ZR1 Vette in say a 12 hour road race???
 
That's all way cool but do you seriously think that either one would stand a chance against a ZR1 Vette in say a 12 hour road race???
Are we talking original ZR1 or the new ZR1? I think the original ZR1 would win.. But I don't know if the new ZR's engine could take as much abuse.. the original ZR1 engine was something VERY special! :)
 
Are we talking original ZR1 or the new ZR1? I think the original ZR1 would win.. But I don't know if the new ZR's engine could take as much abuse.. the original ZR1 engine was something VERY special! :)
The 90-95 ZR1 would not stand a chance, imo. The C6 design handles a lot better, has better brakes, and tires due to technology advancement. The Lotus-designed 350 in the first ZR1 was only 380 hp, versus the C6.5 version having 620 horses. Haven't seen too many races with a 620 hp versus a 380 hp engine, but I'm going with the 620.

Pics!
 

Attachments

Discussion starter · #74 ·
Image


that guy would give any vette a run for its money on a road race setting
 
The 90-95 ZR1 would not stand a chance, imo. The C6 design handles a lot better, has better brakes, and tires due to technology advancement. The Lotus-designed 350 in the first ZR1 was only 380 hp, versus the C6.5 version having 620 horses. Haven't seen too many races with a 620 hp versus a 380 hp engine, but I'm going with the 620.

Pics!
Cat,

I owned Just about every generation of Vette so I'm aware of the advancements. And from a sheer numbers look, the C6 ZR1 is a clear cut winner... But... Having said that... The Lotus Engineered (not designed. GM actually did all the design work on everything except for the top end, and outsourced some of the engineering of the top end to lotus) engine has proven it's self to be an endurance engine.. I wonder how the new ZR1 would fair in a 24 hour race. It's a very high performance engine but in a very low tech design. The fact that it has a dry sump system would certainly help in the endurance category.. I just have to wonder if that supercharger can hold up to 24 hours or more, straight.
 
that guy would give any vette a run for its money on a road race setting
Those Lotus Super Sevens/ Catterhams are really nimble cars. Some guys ran one like that in The One Lap pulling a trailer. Crazy, I tell ya.!
 
Cat,

I owned Just about every generation of Vette so I'm aware of the advancements. And from a sheer numbers look, the C6 ZR1 is a clear cut winner... But... Having said that... The Lotus Engineered (not designed. GM actually did all the design work on everything except for the top end, and outsourced some of the engineering of the top end to lotus) engine has proven it's self to be an endurance engine.. I wonder how the new ZR1 would fair in a 24 hour race. It's a very high performance engine but in a very low tech design. The fact that it has a dry sump system would certainly help in the endurance category.. I just have to wonder if that supercharger can hold up to 24 hours or more, straight.
Brett, you'll notice I stacked the odds in my favor when I said a 12 (not 24) hour race.
 
61 - 78 of 78 Posts