You need to rebuild or replace the valve body. Its cheap to do but tedious or i have one.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Where can I get the parts? I removed and rebuilt the steering valve. Nothing can be as bad as that!You need to rebuild or replace the valve body. Its cheap to do but tedious or i have one.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
More than likely Mother Deere. I feel ya on that steering valve thats the first thing on the list for my grandads 318 thats going to suck.Where can I get the parts? I removed and rebuilt the steering valve. Nothing can be as bad as that!
JD parts shows the seal kit as NLA.More than likely Mother Deere. I feel ya on that steering valve thats the first thing on the list for my grandads 318 thats going to suck.Where can I get the parts? I removed and rebuilt the steering valve. Nothing can be as bad as that!
I had just rebuilt my 47 blower 100%. It creates enough down pressure on the quick hitch that it will lift the front tires off the ground... I will check out the mechanism to see if I over tightened the slide.The float position connects both cylinder ports and the through port internal to the valve set that feeds the second spool before continuing on to tank. The result is that the float valve spool gets pressurized when you turn the chute and the area differential of the piston in the lift cylinder takes over, extending the cylinder with about 17% more force than the force acting to retract the cylinder.
It's back feeding the float spool with the pressure required to turn the chute. Worst case scenario, if it takes a full 1000 psi to turn the chute (unlikely), there will be something around 500 lb of extending force applied by the cylinder until the chute control is centered. That 500 lb of force is mitigated by the leverage ratio that the cylinder has to work with to provide the down force, probably about 3:1, or 170 lb at the blower shoes.
Check the chute for how much turning effort is required. Hydraulics is strong enough to overcome a lot of resistance for that task, and there shouldn't really be much resistance. The pressure comes from overcoming that resistance.
No valve rebuild required. Maybe some clean up of the chute turning mechanism, though.
If everything is in spec, there should be little pressure and the down pressure effect should be noticeable only if you are specifically watching for it.
Tudor that was a short and sweet explanation. Learned a little and removed some of the fog in my hydraulics system knowledge. :thanku:The float position connects both cylinder ports and the through port internal to the valve set that feeds the second spool before continuing on to tank. The result is that the float valve spool gets pressurized when you turn the chute and the area differential of the piston in the lift cylinder takes over, extending the cylinder with about 17% more force than the force acting to retract the cylinder.
It's back feeding the float spool with the pressure required to turn the chute. Worst case scenario, if it takes a full 1000 psi to turn the chute (unlikely), there will be something around 500 lb of extending force applied by the cylinder until the chute control is centered. That 500 lb of force is mitigated by the leverage ratio that the cylinder has to work with to provide the down force, probably about 3:1, or 170 lb at the blower shoes.
Check the chute for how much turning effort is required. Hydraulics is strong enough to overcome a lot of resistance for that task, and there shouldn't really be much resistance. The pressure comes from overcoming that resistance.
No valve rebuild required. Maybe some clean up of the chute turning mechanism, though.
If everything is in spec, there should be little pressure and the down pressure effect should be noticeable only if you are specifically watching for it.
You're welcome.Tudor that was a short and sweet explanation. Learned a little and removed some of the fog in my hydraulics system knowledge. :thanku:
So because the resistance in the chute mechanism was greater than spec, it caused the reaction of a backfeed to the next lowest resistance, which was the float valve. Scary when I understand just a little bit of this stuff. :tango_face_grin:
Is there any benefit to having the float spool be the first? A reason why JD did it this way?You're welcome.
Shorter explanation: Everything upstream (back to the pump) is subject to the same pressure as required for the work in progress. The chute control spool is the second spool of the valve set to receive fluid.
In most applications, the float spool is the first to receive fluid.
I don't think that JD has anything to do with it. It's universal. it's the same idea as jumping in a car and finding the gas pedal positioned for your right foot, regardless of where in the world the car originated, or which side of the road it is driven on.Is there any benefit to having the float spool be the first? A reason why JD did it this way?
Thanks Tudor..............that was my mistake........misunderstood your earlier statement...........I will be looking at valve sets closer now.I don't think that JD has anything to do with it. It's universal. it's the same idea as jumping in a car and finding the gas pedal positioned for your right foot, regardless of where in the world the car originated, or which side of the road it is driven on.
As far as I know, it's because loader spool valve sets have the arm lift spool on the left when the work ports are on top, regardless of which side of the tractor they are on. Since the arms are what needs to float, and the supply port from the pump is on the left in that configuration, it follows that the float spool is first.
My MF1655 uses the same valve set on its right fender as what is on left side of two of my loaders. Even though the valve set is mounted backwards, the supply port is on the left, and the left most spool is for floating an implement. My SCUT has the joystick on the right side, but again, the supply port and the float spool are on the left side of the valve body.
Conformity and consistency are the two words that come to mind. It helps the operator switch from one machine to another when the controls work the same, and it helps the mechanic track down issues with the hydraulics when the basic circuit is the same for all machines.
If you think hard about it, half the blade wants to swing to the right due to the snow load on in it, The other half has an equal load of snow trying to swing the blade to the left.On my 445 i would be running with a 54blade angled in float, then straigten it just before hitting the pile and never had the lift do anything funny. That way more load then any chute rotator. I also dont have issues curling my loader while still in float.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
The force that creats plow steering is in play. When plowing even fully loaded snow moves leading edge to trailing edge also increasing load on the trailing edge.If you think hard about it, half the blade wants to swing to the right due to the snow load on in it, The other half has an equal load of snow trying to swing the blade to the left.
The cylinder just applies enough force to tip the balance in favour of one or the other.
Even if the blade is only loaded on one side, It doesn't take a lot of force to change the angle. I learned this using a 30" steel snow scraper clearing driveways when I was 10 years old, and a 36" steel scraper when clearing the local outdoor rink at the same tender age.