I think the quick answer is that unlike an aerodynamic car cruising on the highway or using regenerative braking in a stop/go environment a tractor does typically use a fair chunk of its available power during normal use. That said, for light-use scenarios like lawn maintenance it might be possible to get buy with much less average power - a Deere 110 got by with 7hp and could probably cut the grass with less.Ford is apparently starting to provide kits to convert gasoline vehicle to electric
I am aware of walk-behinds (I own one) but hadn't seen zero turns or riding mowers - will go take a look, thanks !There are already electric walkbehinds, zero turns, and riding mowers for sale, from low-end models to commercial models.
They do have laws that they have to make some noise like a "normal" car. Im not sure when that rule came about, or if its a country/state, or whatever law. When I worked for VW and the eGolf came out, they had a noise generator that came on under set conditions. I think it was manly parking lot speeds.But I will ask those who have EV machines, is there a place to attach a few pieces of cardboard or a pop bottle to mimic the noise of a gas engine.....
///
Let's not drop off the deep end and get this shut down.Ok, so there is currently a slim majority that EV will suit their needs. But where the problem lies is the fact that they are shoving these things down everyone’s throats… why? It simple, as with all tech companies, it comes down to one basic thing… built in obsolescence. Why build a quality product that lasts for years, when you can force people to buy a product at inflated prices that you can remotely continue to slow down and shorten life spans or just remotely shut it off until the consumer pays some garbage fee of some sort. It’s been working for Apple for years, and they’ve admitted it and nothing comes from it. Tesla is doing it as well. Avoid this garbage all together before you help them destroy your financial security and the environment.
I'm sure it can be done, but it seems someone needs to first build an EV tractor that is reliable and practical for daily use.Ford is apparently starting to provide kits to convert gasoline vehicle to electric
CBS Video on Ford Electric Conversion kits
I agree with most of what you say except one thing, It might be cleaner but it will never be CHEAPER.Dave 55
Warning. This is an off topic from the OPs post so if you are interested in specific electric conversion technology skip this post. If you want to think about the electric vehicle transition then I hope this helps:
I agree that electric conversion is a transfer from local usually urban, to distanced, usually rural sites. As wind power, solar PV, fields, and energy storage systems proliferate your coal plant is going to go away. Not just because the environment issues demand it but because it is not the cheapest way to make power anymore. I’m betting those of us that live down wind of that smokestack and suffer the ills it produces will be fine with that. There is a good possibility it might get converted to burn natural gas to augment nature when the demand is there. Cold starting a coal plant is not feasible for peak augmentation whereas gas is. My (or anyone else's) opinion will not count in this transition as the economy will be the determinant. One- possibly the greatest- peak power resource will be those dispersed electric vehicles which can give back the storage we don’t need at a cost to the power providers at less than any peak production would cost. The distribution system to provide the charging and its recoupment exists if some small upgrades are applied ie. metering. Charging after midnight flattens the peak demand and lessens the costs as well.
I am not meaning to incite any pro or anti argument but I do wonder why there is so much negativity and resentment about what seems like an inevitably cheaper and cleaner energy system. Power producers will move us that way because they can make money, avoid risks related to their pollution, avoid replacing aging fossil fuel plants that create a myriad of headaches for them and can avoid additional higher costs as subsidies for fossil fuels expire and get applied to renewables. If you had your life savings to invest in one industry would you buy stock in that coal plant 5 miles away?
View attachment 2566895
So where does all those components that make up all those clean energy products come from. Seems most of the items are mined and then shipped all over the world. So it seems you are once again just moving the place it comes from. Try going a week without something that uses fossil fuels or its byproducts. Solar and wind farms were studied and shows once you get away from prime areas you will need more and more to produce the same amount of energy. So they will cut down trees to build these clean energy farms that are NOT truly clean and prices will skyrocket for energy.Dave 55
Warning. This is an off topic from the OPs post so if you are interested in specific electric conversion technology skip this post. If you want to think about the electric vehicle transition then I hope this helps:
I agree that electric conversion is a transfer from local usually urban, to distanced, usually rural sites. As wind power, solar PV, fields, and energy storage systems proliferate your coal plant is going to go away. Not just because the environment issues demand it but because it is not the cheapest way to make power anymore. I’m betting those of us that live down wind of that smokestack and suffer the ills it produces will be fine with that. There is a good possibility it might get converted to burn natural gas to augment nature when the demand is there. Cold starting a coal plant is not feasible for peak augmentation whereas gas is. My (or anyone else's) opinion will not count in this transition as the economy will be the determinant. One- possibly the greatest- peak power resource will be those dispersed electric vehicles which can give back the storage we don’t need at a cost to the power providers at less than any peak production would cost. The distribution system to provide the charging and its recoupment exists if some small upgrades are applied ie. metering. Charging after midnight flattens the peak demand and lessens the costs as well.
I am not meaning to incite any pro or anti argument but I do wonder why there is so much negativity and resentment about what seems like an inevitably cheaper and cleaner energy system. Power producers will move us that way because they can make money, avoid risks related to their pollution, avoid replacing aging fossil fuel plants that create a myriad of headaches for them and can avoid additional higher costs as subsidies for fossil fuels expire and get applied to renewables. If you had your life savings to invest in one industry would you buy stock in that coal plant 5 miles away?
View attachment 2566895