Joined
·
12 Posts
Hi,
This is my first post, thanks in advance for any advice. I picked up a Gravely Professional 16-G yesterday, with a Kohler Magnum m18s that the previous owner pretty well destroyed. I removed the heads and cylinders today to discover both connecting rods shattered, the crankshaft journals totally gouged, the skirt on one of the cylinders broken and the camshaft in pieces. I have no intention of trying to fix this engine, so if there are parts that might help someone else, please let me know. Off-hand, I would guess the parts worth saving are the block, heads, flywheel, starter, intake maniford, carb, ignition, etc.
I'm also going to pick up an 816 tomorrow with a smooth running Onan CCKA twin, that has good compression and sounds great, until you put it into gear. It moves around OK and seems to operate as it should, except for the metallic grinding noise. The clutches don't seem to be slipping, the noise sounds more internal. (It doesn't seem to matter if the PTO is engaged or not.) All of the fluids seem full and the gaps on both clutches are around .010".
I'm brand new to Gravely, but have heard great things, especially about the 16-G tractor and the Onan CCKA engine. I don't know if they were ever offered together, but does anyone know what kind of issues I might run into if I try to put the Onan on the 16G? Both tractors are complete right now and if there isn't much benefit to the 16G over the 816, then maybe I'll concentrate on just restoring the 816 instead of swapping engines.
My understanding is that the 16G has several improvements, like the clutch system, a slightly longer frame, tighter steering, as well as probably being about 15 years newer. I'm hoping that means more available parts. The main uses would be general landscaping, creating & maintaining a garden, moving trailers around on the property, material handling of rock, dirt and some concrete I'm going to break out, some mowing and snow removal.
I'm hoping to make this a father-and-son project, as I'd much rather see my boy learn some basic mechanic, machining and welding skills than watch him play video games. I'm also planning to fabricate and install a front loader, I have most of the hydraulics already. I made one for a John Deere 318 a couple of years ago, but I had to add about 300 pounds of ballast to the rear to keep from tipping and that seemed like a lot of weight for the tires.
I really like the rear-engine design of the Gravely; it seems ideal for a small FEL and with the addition of a sub-frame, it think it could handle the stress well. I would probably go with larger tires all around to be sure the added weight isn't a problem. Even though I love the current low center-of-gravity for stability & safety, I wouldn't mind a couple of more inches of ground clearance under the rear bracket. If the new tires also resulted in a wider stance, the center of gravity shouldn't change that much.
Even after I aired up the existing tires as much as I dared to yesterday, when I winched it up 10-foot long ramps into my pickup truck, the back of the tractor still dug several inches into the ground. Of course, I may need to modify the mower deck travel & watch the PTO driveshaft angle if I increase the ground clearance more than an inch or two.
By the way, the 816 I'm looking to pick up tomorrow also has a 5' mower deck and a few other small implements. Both tractors have front PTOs and hand-clutches, I'm thinking that I would need to add or change to a foot clutch as well. Between scooping and back-dragging with a bucket, I just don't see any way around needing foot-controlled movement capability. I saw some great threads on here about converting to a heel-toe foot pedal on the right and moving the brake to the left side, or just attaching a foot peg to the hand clutch bar. I'd like to explore the ability to keep the hand clutch intact on the right and add a forward & reverse pedal mechanism on the left side to use when operating the bucket, even if the pedal didn't lock into position.
Thanks for taking the time to read this and for sharing any thoughts you might have. Even if I never got the tractor finished, it would be a great excuse to spend time with my son, but based on our previous projects, I expect that we should have a running, basic tractor in a month or two. (It seems that these tractor projects become so much fun that everything else gets put on hold and the tractor gets priority until it is running!) Then we can examine the feasibility of adding the FEL and some type of directional-control pedal set-up. I don't see the need for the additional pedals unless there is an FEL, but with a front bucket, I don't think I could do without the pedals.
I just sold a 4-wheel drive diesel tractor with a 3-point brush-hog and a front loader that was too big for our new property, so I'm pretty committed to the FEL / bucket, which led me to go with Gravely in the first place for this project. Thanks again for your time and input and be sure to let me know if you need anything off the M18S and we'll work something out. I guess I'll probably have an extra 816 tractor left over when we're done as well, take care.
This is my first post, thanks in advance for any advice. I picked up a Gravely Professional 16-G yesterday, with a Kohler Magnum m18s that the previous owner pretty well destroyed. I removed the heads and cylinders today to discover both connecting rods shattered, the crankshaft journals totally gouged, the skirt on one of the cylinders broken and the camshaft in pieces. I have no intention of trying to fix this engine, so if there are parts that might help someone else, please let me know. Off-hand, I would guess the parts worth saving are the block, heads, flywheel, starter, intake maniford, carb, ignition, etc.
I'm also going to pick up an 816 tomorrow with a smooth running Onan CCKA twin, that has good compression and sounds great, until you put it into gear. It moves around OK and seems to operate as it should, except for the metallic grinding noise. The clutches don't seem to be slipping, the noise sounds more internal. (It doesn't seem to matter if the PTO is engaged or not.) All of the fluids seem full and the gaps on both clutches are around .010".
I'm brand new to Gravely, but have heard great things, especially about the 16-G tractor and the Onan CCKA engine. I don't know if they were ever offered together, but does anyone know what kind of issues I might run into if I try to put the Onan on the 16G? Both tractors are complete right now and if there isn't much benefit to the 16G over the 816, then maybe I'll concentrate on just restoring the 816 instead of swapping engines.
My understanding is that the 16G has several improvements, like the clutch system, a slightly longer frame, tighter steering, as well as probably being about 15 years newer. I'm hoping that means more available parts. The main uses would be general landscaping, creating & maintaining a garden, moving trailers around on the property, material handling of rock, dirt and some concrete I'm going to break out, some mowing and snow removal.
I'm hoping to make this a father-and-son project, as I'd much rather see my boy learn some basic mechanic, machining and welding skills than watch him play video games. I'm also planning to fabricate and install a front loader, I have most of the hydraulics already. I made one for a John Deere 318 a couple of years ago, but I had to add about 300 pounds of ballast to the rear to keep from tipping and that seemed like a lot of weight for the tires.
I really like the rear-engine design of the Gravely; it seems ideal for a small FEL and with the addition of a sub-frame, it think it could handle the stress well. I would probably go with larger tires all around to be sure the added weight isn't a problem. Even though I love the current low center-of-gravity for stability & safety, I wouldn't mind a couple of more inches of ground clearance under the rear bracket. If the new tires also resulted in a wider stance, the center of gravity shouldn't change that much.
Even after I aired up the existing tires as much as I dared to yesterday, when I winched it up 10-foot long ramps into my pickup truck, the back of the tractor still dug several inches into the ground. Of course, I may need to modify the mower deck travel & watch the PTO driveshaft angle if I increase the ground clearance more than an inch or two.
By the way, the 816 I'm looking to pick up tomorrow also has a 5' mower deck and a few other small implements. Both tractors have front PTOs and hand-clutches, I'm thinking that I would need to add or change to a foot clutch as well. Between scooping and back-dragging with a bucket, I just don't see any way around needing foot-controlled movement capability. I saw some great threads on here about converting to a heel-toe foot pedal on the right and moving the brake to the left side, or just attaching a foot peg to the hand clutch bar. I'd like to explore the ability to keep the hand clutch intact on the right and add a forward & reverse pedal mechanism on the left side to use when operating the bucket, even if the pedal didn't lock into position.
Thanks for taking the time to read this and for sharing any thoughts you might have. Even if I never got the tractor finished, it would be a great excuse to spend time with my son, but based on our previous projects, I expect that we should have a running, basic tractor in a month or two. (It seems that these tractor projects become so much fun that everything else gets put on hold and the tractor gets priority until it is running!) Then we can examine the feasibility of adding the FEL and some type of directional-control pedal set-up. I don't see the need for the additional pedals unless there is an FEL, but with a front bucket, I don't think I could do without the pedals.
I just sold a 4-wheel drive diesel tractor with a 3-point brush-hog and a front loader that was too big for our new property, so I'm pretty committed to the FEL / bucket, which led me to go with Gravely in the first place for this project. Thanks again for your time and input and be sure to let me know if you need anything off the M18S and we'll work something out. I guess I'll probably have an extra 816 tractor left over when we're done as well, take care.