Have been racking my brain over the last few weeks about this. Originally liked the Deere better, but after looking closer at the Cub, I started leaning more toward it. The Cub looks to have some better components. A few plastic idler pulleys can be seen under the D105, plus Deere could have done a nicer job making the wiring neater.
Slightly fearful of the Kohler Courage, but tempted by it's slighty higher torque rating. Would it even be noticable in mowing performance ? Think the Intek of the Deere is the better choice ?
Control layout of the D105 is better in my opinion. Figure I've spent years reaching to my right for a shifter, so the Cub would have a learning curve. Seem able to get on and off the D105 better. Cub seat feels a bit nicer and the cloth like material might beat out the Deere during scalding hot days.
Plastic housing transaxle of the D105 doesn't have much of an appeal, nor does the plastic hood hinge setup. Noticed the higher end Deeres have a hinge closer to the Cub's design and also the same brand of tires. (Kenda on the D series, Carlisle on Cub and Deere X's)
Like the fuel tank under seat on the D105, figure it gives more weight over rear axle and a lower center of gravity. Wish it was mounted to something and not just flopping around.
The few posts about the LTX1040 in the Cub forum seem set against the CVT setup, advise is usually to spend the extra for the Hydro. Postings about the D105 do not seem against the CVT setup, even though from what I can tell it's is a new setup as far as components used.
Spindles and deck pulleys look better on the D105 (but looks can decieve) also I can see the grease zerks. Know the Cub has them but have not been able to actually see them. Only 2 anti scalp wheels on the Deere compared to 4 on the Cub. Read that on a 42in deck it's not an issue.
Does either mower actually mow better ? Cub brags on the "aerospace engineer designed deck" Either one less likely to clog or leave an unmowed strip due to blade offset ?
Cub deck seems to "float" easier using hands to lift it. Deere deck seems to resist upper movement. Is it just heavier ? What's better, deck that floats up easier or one that stays planted on the ground more ?
Paint under the Deere deck looks thin, the deck of the X series looked much better. Fear is that Deere is building the D series more to a price point than MTD is with the Cub.
Like the warranty of the Deere better. Cub has that (for them) convienent clause about "normal wear parts". Not that they would, but I can imagine the "well every part wears out" line when something goes wrong. Deere is supposed to be checked out buy a local dealer (have to buy at HD due to credit) but who knows how well checked they are. Lots of Cub buyers seem to have to tweak deck leveling etc once at home.
So, is either one going to be more durable.
Either one going to have fewer problems intially ?
Better cut from ?
Or is it all a wash and I may as well decide if I like Yellow and White vs Green and Yellow. :dunno:
Thanks for suffering through my long winded post. :fing32:
Oh, the SO likes the Deere better. She of course is going by looks.
(noticed in youtube vids that Cubs go "Mmmmmmmmmm" while the Deere has a "Rawrrrrrrrrr" sound with the PTO engaged) :ROF
Slightly fearful of the Kohler Courage, but tempted by it's slighty higher torque rating. Would it even be noticable in mowing performance ? Think the Intek of the Deere is the better choice ?
Control layout of the D105 is better in my opinion. Figure I've spent years reaching to my right for a shifter, so the Cub would have a learning curve. Seem able to get on and off the D105 better. Cub seat feels a bit nicer and the cloth like material might beat out the Deere during scalding hot days.
Plastic housing transaxle of the D105 doesn't have much of an appeal, nor does the plastic hood hinge setup. Noticed the higher end Deeres have a hinge closer to the Cub's design and also the same brand of tires. (Kenda on the D series, Carlisle on Cub and Deere X's)
Like the fuel tank under seat on the D105, figure it gives more weight over rear axle and a lower center of gravity. Wish it was mounted to something and not just flopping around.
The few posts about the LTX1040 in the Cub forum seem set against the CVT setup, advise is usually to spend the extra for the Hydro. Postings about the D105 do not seem against the CVT setup, even though from what I can tell it's is a new setup as far as components used.
Spindles and deck pulleys look better on the D105 (but looks can decieve) also I can see the grease zerks. Know the Cub has them but have not been able to actually see them. Only 2 anti scalp wheels on the Deere compared to 4 on the Cub. Read that on a 42in deck it's not an issue.
Does either mower actually mow better ? Cub brags on the "aerospace engineer designed deck" Either one less likely to clog or leave an unmowed strip due to blade offset ?
Cub deck seems to "float" easier using hands to lift it. Deere deck seems to resist upper movement. Is it just heavier ? What's better, deck that floats up easier or one that stays planted on the ground more ?
Paint under the Deere deck looks thin, the deck of the X series looked much better. Fear is that Deere is building the D series more to a price point than MTD is with the Cub.
Like the warranty of the Deere better. Cub has that (for them) convienent clause about "normal wear parts". Not that they would, but I can imagine the "well every part wears out" line when something goes wrong. Deere is supposed to be checked out buy a local dealer (have to buy at HD due to credit) but who knows how well checked they are. Lots of Cub buyers seem to have to tweak deck leveling etc once at home.
So, is either one going to be more durable.
Either one going to have fewer problems intially ?
Better cut from ?
Or is it all a wash and I may as well decide if I like Yellow and White vs Green and Yellow. :dunno:
Thanks for suffering through my long winded post. :fing32:
Oh, the SO likes the Deere better. She of course is going by looks.
(noticed in youtube vids that Cubs go "Mmmmmmmmmm" while the Deere has a "Rawrrrrrrrrr" sound with the PTO engaged) :ROF