425 FEL Build - MyTractorForum.com - The Friendliest Tractor Forum and Best Place for Tractor Information
John Deere Forum John Deere Garden Tractor talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 100 Old 01-11-2019, 03:41 PM Thread Starter
Senior MTF Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central MA
Posts: 149
425 FEL Build

Making some progress. I started with the plan of building a FEL for my 318, but a good deal on a 425 came along. So I will continue with the plan of using the 425. It has better on board hydraulics and a much better directional control (foot actuated).

Do you guys think the bucket mock up in this picture has enough curl at ground height? The loader arm in the picture is positioned so that the bucket would be at ground height if attached to the tractor. I'm thinking of making the bucket a little taller, but this was the tallest piece of cardboard I had handy for a mock up.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	bucket mock up.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	2.37 MB
ID:	2356269  

1988 JD 318
1998 425
turboaudi80 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 100 Old 01-11-2019, 04:12 PM
Proud Member of the 1K Club
 
Wfburton159's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ND
Posts: 1,584
Re: 425 FEL Build

That is about right. The problem with too much curl is that it usually results in less dump at full height.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	X485loader.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	962.7 KB
ID:	2356275   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7843.JPG
Views:	103
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	2356277   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7845.JPG
Views:	94
Size:	1.64 MB
ID:	2356279  


2003 John Deere X485
45 FEL w/ custom quick tach sliding forks
647 tiller
54c deck w/ mulch kit and power flow bagger
OTC weather enclosure w/ heat, glass, wiper, lights
Quick tach model 50 snowthrower w/ long chute
Custom 52" quick tach front blade
Modified foam filled turfs off a 400 (183# each)
75# wheel weights and chains
John Deere 40" Front Mount Thatcher w/hydraulic lift
John Deere 14SB
Wfburton159 is offline  
post #3 of 100 Old 01-12-2019, 03:18 AM
20,000 Posts & Climbing
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Posts: 21,221
Re: 425 FEL Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wfburton159 View Post
That is about right. The problem with too much curl is that it usually results in less dump at full height.
Or material coming off the back side onto the hood when lifted to full height and curled all the way back. This is a common occurrence when using a loader for snow removal and can happen almost as easily with gravel or dirt if the material in the bucket is piled high.

Most GT buckets are roughly square in dimension, height equals front to back depth. Your design appears to be shorter in height than front to back. Excess front to back depth results in less lifting force at the cutting edge, a fact that you will appreciate more when you make use of it.

Bob

Click for The Hydraulics Forum!

Sometimes you get on a roll, sometimes the roll gets on you.

In Service
MF GC2310, Husqvarna YTH20B42T

Down for Repairs
MF1655 w/ FEL, MF1655, MF12H, MF8H, MF7H
Spending too much time on MTF to work on my toys.
TUDOR is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 100 Old 01-12-2019, 04:05 AM
20,000 Posts & Climbing
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Posts: 21,221
Re: 425 FEL Build

Here's a thread that you will find interesting.

And another with some helpful links.
TUDOR is online now  
post #5 of 100 Old 01-12-2019, 11:09 AM
3K Poster!!!!
 
inspectorudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,411
Re: 425 FEL Build

You also want to make the total down position of the bucket when the bottom is parallel to the ground about 2 inches below the surface. This will allow a flat scraping of the ground without having the front edge of the bucket tilted downward. If you wanted to level a bumpy area you would want this function to have a bottom below the surface you are working on. The way I did mine was to put the tractor tires on 2-inch boards when fitting the bucket to the arms. The bucket was on the floor of my shop so when I finished the bucket would go down to two inches below the shop floor.
inspectorudy is offline  
post #6 of 100 Old 01-14-2019, 07:46 AM Thread Starter
Senior MTF Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central MA
Posts: 149
Re: 425 FEL Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUDOR View Post
Here's a thread that you will find interesting.

And another with some helpful links.
That thread of Eric's was very informative. You discussed 3" below grade and flat bottom. Rudy suggested at least 2". I'll check that in my mock up.

I would like to add a comment, because timberwolf was critical of the cost of a set of plans. I started with Paul's plans from P.F. Engineering. He was really helpful and responsive with initial questions of mine. I'm only an hour away from him and he even offered me to come out and check out his loader in person. I realize there is lots of room for style beyond his design, but I think he makes it so average guys can actually build a FEL. I think his price is very fair for the amount of info you get in one complete package. Very few of us have the time, facility, and skill to build a beautiful loader like Grampajay's. I strayed a little from Paul's design for a few reasons, and most of them are dumb so I won't elaborate. Now I'm in the process of correcting the mistakes I have already made. I don't think I have gotten too far off track.


In Eric's thread you commented on the strength of round cross bar compared to square tube. I have a 2 1/4", 1/8" wall tube that I was planning on using for the cross bar. That's similar to the JD 4X loaders. Eric's cross bar was much smaller, I think only 1.5". Do you think my tube is strong enough?

1988 JD 318
1998 425
turboaudi80 is online now  
post #7 of 100 Old 01-15-2019, 03:34 AM
20,000 Posts & Climbing
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Posts: 21,221
Re: 425 FEL Build

Refresh my memory please. Which cross bar? There are two, one between the arms to control racking, and one on the subframe to support the posts.

On mine, the one between the arms is roughly 3" square by 1/16" (original) and is a bit lighter than I would choose, but it has survived. The one supporting the posts is 2" square by 1/4" wall (my build) and is maybe a bit on the heavy side but it did have to lift the rear of the tractor with over 800 lb of ballast (total over 1500 lb with tractor and operator) to counter payload in the bucket.

Bob

Click for The Hydraulics Forum!

Sometimes you get on a roll, sometimes the roll gets on you.

In Service
MF GC2310, Husqvarna YTH20B42T

Down for Repairs
MF1655 w/ FEL, MF1655, MF12H, MF8H, MF7H
Spending too much time on MTF to work on my toys.
TUDOR is online now  
post #8 of 100 Old 01-15-2019, 06:37 AM
3K Poster!!!!
 
inspectorudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,411
Re: 425 FEL Build

All the loaders that I have owned or built had round cross arm braces. I know that squares/rectangles are technically stronger but it must not be a big thing because so many loaders have round tubes. The one on my 44 is about 2-inches around and 1/4 thick. I can't imagine twisting that with the short arms on the loader. It also goes through all sides of the arms and is welded on both sides. Maybe Tudor can explain what that does versus welding a square tube on only one side of each arm. I think when we are building a loader, we have a tendency to overbuild them. If you look at the old Johnson series they looked like toys yet they are still around today. No matter, just make it like you want it and it will outperform all of us!
inspectorudy is offline  
post #9 of 100 Old 01-15-2019, 07:37 AM
Senior MTF Member
 
whx595's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 507
Re: 425 FEL Build

the 425 works well with a loader; suggest adjusting the implement pressure after you finish to maximize your usage of the FEL. Assume you plan to run the FEL off the OEM implement valve? the OEM loader for the 425 was the JD No. 40 loader; which has long been out of fabrication by John Deere and used ones are rare finds ( very few were sold due to the high sticker price approx. $3,000 ) I did own a 425 w a 40 loader, attached are the few pic's I have; hope it helps? good luck!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Backhoe-1.JPG
Views:	108
Size:	957.4 KB
ID:	2356835   Click image for larger version

Name:	Backhoe-3.JPG
Views:	107
Size:	736.1 KB
ID:	2356837  

John deere x595
No 45 FEL
6 ft snow plow & cab
R4 tire upgrade
6 ft. Backhoe
Husqvarna 372XPW dual port; 288XP dual port; Jonsered 2095 dual port; Husky 3120XP dual port,
whx595 is offline  
post #10 of 100 Old 01-15-2019, 06:11 PM
3K Poster!!!!
 
inspectorudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,411
Re: 425 FEL Build

Notice the arm crossbar on the 40 loader? It is the same as the one on my 44 loader and round for reference.
inspectorudy is offline  
post #11 of 100 Old 01-15-2019, 07:46 PM
Senior MTF Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 690
Re: 425 FEL Build

The skeptic in me tells me that a round crossbar (pipe) is used, instead of rectangular or square tubing, mainly because it is easier to manufacture. I do think that the loader arm assembly is much stronger if the crosspipe goes through the loader arm and is welded on both sides, compared to just butting up to and welded against the inside, like the Johnson loaders. I think it would be harder for a manufacturer to cut the square or rectangular holes.

On my homebuilt loader, I used 2 x 4 x 3/16" tubing, cut through the arms, welded on both sides. A heavy walled pipe would have worked too.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	420 3 004 (Small).jpg
Views:	106
Size:	71.6 KB
ID:	2356907  
1969140 is offline  
post #12 of 100 Old 01-16-2019, 01:42 AM
20,000 Posts & Climbing
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Posts: 21,221
Re: 425 FEL Build

Quote:
Originally Posted by inspectorudy View Post
All the loaders that I have owned or built had round cross arm braces. I know that squares/rectangles are technically stronger but it must not be a big thing because so many loaders have round tubes. The one on my 44 is about 2-inches around and 1/4 thick. I can't imagine twisting that with the short arms on the loader. It also goes through all sides of the arms and is welded on both sides. Maybe Tudor can explain what that does versus welding a square tube on only one side of each arm. I think when we are building a loader, we have a tendency to overbuild them. If you look at the old Johnson series they looked like toys yet they are still around today. No matter, just make it like you want it and it will outperform all of us!
The bucket is 6' from the top of the posts. That is not a short distance should the side of the bucket slam into something that doesn't want to move, hence the need for that cross bar for additional strength from lateral loads.

Through the arms and welded on both sides makes for stronger connections and a more rigid set of arms for picking up asymmetrical loads such as prying with one corner of the bucket. Since both cylinders apply the same force, the one on the side of the loader that is not lifting a load could potentially bend the loader arms out of square over a period of time if the cross bar wasn't secure.

Round cross bars that go through the arms are not normally as large in dimension as square cross bars that make use of the top and bottom of the arms to the same effect.

With the forces in use for GT loaders, it's a toss-up as to which is better. It is a lot easier to just use a large dimension square tube type cross bar welded to the insides of the arms. A side benefit is the ready made broad, flat surface to mount the crossover lines from one arm to the other.

Bob

Click for The Hydraulics Forum!

Sometimes you get on a roll, sometimes the roll gets on you.

In Service
MF GC2310, Husqvarna YTH20B42T

Down for Repairs
MF1655 w/ FEL, MF1655, MF12H, MF8H, MF7H
Spending too much time on MTF to work on my toys.
TUDOR is online now  
post #13 of 100 Old 01-16-2019, 03:38 PM
Senior MTF Member
 
whx595's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: connecticut
Posts: 507
Re: 425 FEL Build

I think the round pipe (used on my #45 FEL on the x595) is a lower cost install. the hole in the arms is round (drilled ) and the pipe is cheap, just cut to length and weld on both sides. - done. the cross tube is critical to keeping the arms straight. Have seem one instance (cheap over-seas copy) where the arms were bent when trying to lift with just a corner of the bucket!

John deere x595
No 45 FEL
6 ft snow plow & cab
R4 tire upgrade
6 ft. Backhoe
Husqvarna 372XPW dual port; 288XP dual port; Jonsered 2095 dual port; Husky 3120XP dual port,
whx595 is offline  
post #14 of 100 Old 01-16-2019, 07:00 PM
3K Poster!!!!
 
inspectorudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,411
Re: 425 FEL Build

You are exactly right about round supports being done for cost reasons. I built a CAD plans loader and it called for a round cross support because the average guy does not have the means to cut four square holes in the lift arms. JD uses round tubes for economy because drilling a round hole is fast and efficient compared to a CNC cutting machine and the time involved. I drilled my round holes through both arms together so that they would be square when welded. I cannot imagine how a guy in his shop could cut four rectangle holes that are coincident. I have a plasma cutter that would do the job but I would never know until I welded them if they were plumb. As with many things, cost is the big driver but in this case DIY loaders also have simplicity to contend with. That's a very nice looking loader you built!
inspectorudy is offline  
post #15 of 100 Old 01-17-2019, 12:01 AM
Senior MTF Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 690
Re: 425 FEL Build

Thanks. I think you were referring to my loader, lol!

"I cannot imagine how a guy in his shop could cut four rectangle holes that are coincident."

I drilled the corner holes on one side, and then just drilled through to the other side. With the tubing laying flat on the drill press table, it was supposed to be quite close on the far side. Then cut the lines with a plasma cutter. Seemed to work.
1969140 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MyTractorForum.com - The Friendliest Tractor Forum and Best Place for Tractor Information forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome